Kolena AI Agent
Energy-Efficiency Project Funding Request Review
Turn a commercial energy-efficiency project funding request into a cited analysis - measures and projected savings, cost and incentives, financing terms, a recomputed savings-to-payment coverage ratio and payback, and a funding recommendation.
Volume fit
Works best for
financiers, ESCOs, and C-PACE programs reviewing dozens or more project funding requests a month
Too small for
a one-off single project an analyst can spread by hand faster than assembling the package
Typical inputs
Documents
- Funding application
- Energy audit or engineering study (ASHRAE Level I/II/III)
- Scope of work / measure list
- Equipment quotes or contractor proposal
- Savings calculations and assumptions
- Project cost budget
- Utility rebate / incentive reservation letters
- Baseline utility bills
- Measurement & verification (M&V) plan
- Financing term sheet
- Ownership / property documents
Systems
- Loan / financing origination system
- Document repository
- Utility incentive program portal
Output
A structured, cited funding-request analysis with a recomputed savings-to-payment coverage ratio and simple payback, an M&V summary, consistency and structure checks, a completeness gate, and a funding recommendation
Delivered to
- Credit / investment committee package
- Financing origination system
- Approval / term-sheet memo
What it extracts
· 13 fields
- Form
Funding Request Summary
A one-look roll-up of the request - applicant, project, measure categories, total cost, funding amount, product, and term - so a reviewer can orient before reading the detail.
- Form
Applicant and Site Profile
The applicant's legal identity and the site being financed, including the exact owner, address, and any senior lienholder that a C-PACE assessment depends on, plus property type and size.
- Table
Energy Conservation Measures
Every energy conservation and renewable measure in scope - category, cost, useful life, and projected kWh/kW/therm and dollar savings - the asset base that drives payback, coverage, and structure checks.
- Form
Projected Energy and Cost Savings
The whole-project savings and the assumptions behind them - baseline vs post-retrofit cost, total annual savings, rate and escalation assumptions, and the savings determination basis - the numerator of payback and coverage.
- Table
Project Cost Breakdown
The itemized project cost by component so a reviewer can confirm the lines foot to the stated total and that the funding request is sized to eligible costs.
- Table
Utility Rebates and Incentives
Every rebate, tax incentive, or grant applied to the project, with amount and status, which reduces the net project cost the financing must cover and sharpens the payback.
- Form
Requested Financing Terms
The exact structure requested - product (C-PACE, ESPC, loan, lease, PPA/ESA), amount, term, rate, payment, security/lien, and any savings guarantee - which drives the coverage, payback-versus-term, and structure checks.
- Number
Savings-to-Payment Coverage Ratio
The recomputed ratio of projected annual savings to the annual financing payment - the cash-flow-positive test at the heart of savings-based financing such as C-PACE and energy services agreements.
- Number
Simple Payback Period (Years)
The recomputed simple payback - net project cost after incentives divided by annual savings - benchmarked against the measures' useful life and the financing term.
- Form
Measurement and Verification Plan
The M&V plan - IPMVP option, baseline and reporting periods, governing standard, savings guarantee, and responsible party - the basis on which projected savings are confirmed and, for an ESPC, guaranteed.
- Table
Funding Request Validation
The consistency and structure checks an analyst runs - funding within project cost, cost and savings footing, savings cover payment, payback versus useful life and term, incentives applied, and M&V present - each flagged Pass, Fail, or Review.
- Table
Documentation Completeness
The intake gate: whether each document an underwriter needs to decide is Present, Missing, or N/A, so an undecidable request is caught before a decision.
- Classification
Funding Recommendation and Conditions
A tiered funding recommendation - Approve, Approve with conditions, Refer to committee, Decline, or Incomplete - weighing coverage, payback, M&V, structure, and completeness as decision support for a human underwriter or committee.
Prerequisites
- Your financing product and eligibility rules (coverage-ratio minimum, term-to-useful-life limit, eligible-cost basis)
- A complete funding package for each project
- For C-PACE: the program's term-versus-useful-life rule and existing-lender consent requirement
Human review
An energy-finance underwriter or investment committee reviews the coverage ratio, payback, validation checks, and missing-document items, and clears any Review/Fail flags before a fund/decline decision. The agent produces decision support, not the final funding commitment.
Where it fits
Commercial energy-efficiency project financing
Project development and intake - a property owner, ESCO, or contractor submits a funding request with an energy audit, a scope of work and measure list, equipment quotes and a project budget, savings calculations, incentive documents, and a financing application
This step
Funding request review / underwriting
After
Who uses it
Grounded in
- IPMVP Core Concepts 2022 - International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (Efficiency Valuation Organization, EVO)verified as of 2026-07-22
- ANSI/ASHRAE Guideline 14-2023 - Measurement of Energy, Demand and Water Savingsverified as of 2026-07-22
- ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 211-2018 (RA2023) - Standard for Commercial Building Energy Audits (Levels 1/2/3)verified as of 2026-07-22
- Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) - state-enabled financing; program rules generally cap the financing term at the weighted-average useful life of the financed measures and require existing-mortgage-holder consentverified as of 2026-07-22
- Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR) and Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) framework - U.S. DOE Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)verified as of 2026-07-22
Related agents
Browse all agents →Commercial Equipment-Finance Underwriting
Turn a commercial equipment-finance credit package into a cited underwriting analysis - applicant, collateral, DSCR, structural checks, and a tiered recommendation.
Appraisal Review
Run every appraisal through a productized USPAP review and classify it Accept, Accept-with-conditions, or Reject, with each finding cited to the report.
Change-in-Terms & Cardholder-Agreement Review
Test a credit card change-in-terms notice against Regulation Z: every changed term summarized, the 45-day advance-notice window and right-to-reject verified, penalty rate increases justified and reevaluation-eligible, and every required disclosure present and cited.
See Energy-Efficiency Project Funding Request Review on your documents
We'll run it against a file of yours and walk through every cited field.