Energy-Efficiency Project Funding Request Review
Turn a commercial energy-efficiency project funding request into a cited analysis - measures and projected savings, cost and incentives, financing terms, a recomputed savings-to-payment coverage ratio and payback, and a funding recommendation.
What it extracts
13 extraction fields
- Funding Request Summary
- A one-look roll-up of the request - applicant, project, measure categories, total cost, funding amount, product, and term - so a reviewer can orient before reading the detail.
- Applicant and Site Profile
- The applicant's legal identity and the site being financed, including the exact owner, address, and any senior lienholder that a C-PACE assessment depends on, plus property type and size.
- Energy Conservation Measures
- Every energy conservation and renewable measure in scope - category, cost, useful life, and projected kWh/kW/therm and dollar savings - the asset base that drives payback, coverage, and structure checks.
- Projected Energy and Cost Savings
- The whole-project savings and the assumptions behind them - baseline vs post-retrofit cost, total annual savings, rate and escalation assumptions, and the savings determination basis - the numerator of payback and coverage.
- Project Cost Breakdown
- The itemized project cost by component so a reviewer can confirm the lines foot to the stated total and that the funding request is sized to eligible costs.
- Utility Rebates and Incentives
- Every rebate, tax incentive, or grant applied to the project, with amount and status, which reduces the net project cost the financing must cover and sharpens the payback.
- Requested Financing Terms
- The exact structure requested - product (C-PACE, ESPC, loan, lease, PPA/ESA), amount, term, rate, payment, security/lien, and any savings guarantee - which drives the coverage, payback-versus-term, and structure checks.
- Savings-to-Payment Coverage Ratio
- The recomputed ratio of projected annual savings to the annual financing payment - the cash-flow-positive test at the heart of savings-based financing such as C-PACE and energy services agreements.
- Simple Payback Period (Years)
- The recomputed simple payback - net project cost after incentives divided by annual savings - benchmarked against the measures' useful life and the financing term.
- Measurement and Verification Plan
- The M&V plan - IPMVP option, baseline and reporting periods, governing standard, savings guarantee, and responsible party - the basis on which projected savings are confirmed and, for an ESPC, guaranteed.
- Funding Request Validation
- The consistency and structure checks an analyst runs - funding within project cost, cost and savings footing, savings cover payment, payback versus useful life and term, incentives applied, and M&V present - each flagged Pass, Fail, or Review.
- Documentation Completeness
- The intake gate: whether each document an underwriter needs to decide is Present, Missing, or N/A, so an undecidable request is caught before a decision.
- Funding Recommendation and Conditions
- A tiered funding recommendation - Approve, Approve with conditions, Refer to committee, Decline, or Incomplete - weighing coverage, payback, M&V, structure, and completeness as decision support for a human underwriter or committee.
Where it fits
Commercial energy-efficiency project financing
Upstream
Project development and intake - a property owner, ESCO, or contractor submits a funding request with an energy audit, a scope of work and measure list, equipment quotes and a project budget, savings calculations, incentive documents, and a financing application
This step
Funding request review / underwriting
Downstream
- Credit or investment committee decision
- Financing close (C-PACE assessment, ESPC, loan, lease, or PPA/ESA)
- Installation and commissioning
- Measurement & verification of realized savings
What it needs
Documents
- Funding application
- Energy audit or engineering study (ASHRAE Level I/II/III)
- Scope of work / measure list
- Equipment quotes or contractor proposal
- Savings calculations and assumptions
- Project cost budget
- Utility rebate / incentive reservation letters
- Baseline utility bills
- Measurement & verification (M&V) plan
- Financing term sheet
- Ownership / property documents
Systems
- Loan / financing origination system
- Document repository
- Utility incentive program portal
Prerequisites
- Your financing product and eligibility rules (coverage-ratio minimum, term-to-useful-life limit, eligible-cost basis)
- A complete funding package for each project
- For C-PACE: the program's term-versus-useful-life rule and existing-lender consent requirement
What it produces
A structured, cited funding-request analysis with a recomputed savings-to-payment coverage ratio and simple payback, an M&V summary, consistency and structure checks, a completeness gate, and a funding recommendation
Delivered to
- Credit / investment committee package
- Financing origination system
- Approval / term-sheet memo
Review model
An energy-finance underwriter or investment committee reviews the coverage ratio, payback, validation checks, and missing-document items, and clears any Review/Fail flags before a fund/decline decision. The agent produces decision support, not the final funding commitment.
Who uses it
Volume fit
Works best for
financiers, ESCOs, and C-PACE programs reviewing dozens or more project funding requests a month
Too small for
a one-off single project an analyst can spread by hand faster than assembling the package
Grounded in
- IPMVP Core Concepts 2022 - International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (Efficiency Valuation Organization, EVO)verified as of 2026-07-22
- ANSI/ASHRAE Guideline 14-2023 - Measurement of Energy, Demand and Water Savingsverified as of 2026-07-22
- ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 211-2018 (RA2023) - Standard for Commercial Building Energy Audits (Levels 1/2/3)verified as of 2026-07-22
- Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) - state-enabled financing; program rules generally cap the financing term at the weighted-average useful life of the financed measures and require existing-mortgage-holder consentverified as of 2026-07-22
- Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR) and Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) framework - U.S. DOE Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)verified as of 2026-07-22
Changelog
- July 2026
based on a production deployment at a commercial energy-efficiency financier
Related agents
Browse all agents →Commercial Equipment-Finance Underwriting
Turn a commercial equipment-finance credit package into a cited underwriting analysis - applicant, collateral, DSCR, structural checks, and a tiered recommendation.
Appraisal Review
Run every appraisal through a productized USPAP review and classify it Accept, Accept-with-conditions, or Reject, with each finding cited to the report.
Change-in-Terms & Cardholder-Agreement Review
Test a credit card change-in-terms notice against Regulation Z: every changed term summarized, the 45-day advance-notice window and right-to-reject verified, penalty rate increases justified and reevaluation-eligible, and every required disclosure present and cited.
See Energy-Efficiency Project Funding Request Review on your documents
We'll run it against a file of yours and walk through every cited field.